Current:Home > StocksCalifornia considers unique safety regulations for AI companies, but faces tech firm opposition -Blueprint Money Mastery
California considers unique safety regulations for AI companies, but faces tech firm opposition
View
Date:2025-04-14 16:29:32
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers are considering legislation that would require artificial intelligence companies to test their systems and add safety measures so they can’t be potentially manipulated to wipe out the state’s electric grid or help build chemical weapons — scenarios that experts say could be possible in the future as technology evolves at warp speed.
Legislators plan to vote Tuesday on this first-of-its-kind bill, which aims to reduce risks created by AI. It is fiercely opposed by tech companies, including Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, and Google. They say the regulations take aim at developers and instead should be focused on those who use and exploit the AI systems for harm.
Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener, who authors the bill, said the proposal would provide reasonable safety standards by preventing “catastrophic harms” from extremely powerful AI models that may be created in the future. The requirements would only apply to systems that cost more than $100 million in computing power to train. No current AI models have hit that threshold as of July.
“This is not about smaller AI models,” Wiener said at a recent legislative hearing. “This is about incredibly large and powerful models that, as far as we know, do not exist today but will exist in the near future.”
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has touted California as an early AI adopter and regulator, saying the state could soon deploy generative AI tools to address highway congestion, make roads safer and provide tax guidance. At the same time, his administration is considering new rules against AI discrimination in hiring practices. He declined to comment on the bill but has warned that overregulation could put the state in a “perilous position.”
The proposal, supported by some of the most renowned AI researchers, would also create a new state agency to oversee developers and provide best practices. The state attorney general also would be able to pursue legal actions in case of violations.
A growing coalition of tech companies argue the requirements would discourage companies from developing large AI systems or keeping their technology open-source.
“The bill will make the AI ecosystem less safe, jeopardize open-source models relied on by startups and small businesses, rely on standards that do not exist, and introduce regulatory fragmentation,” Rob Sherman, Meta vice president and deputy chief privacy officer, wrote in a letter sent to lawmakers.
The proposal could also drive companies out of state to avoid the regulations, the state’s Chamber of Commerce said.
Opponents want to wait for more guidance from the federal government. Proponents of the bill said California cannot wait, citing hard lessons they learned not acting soon enough to reign in social media companies.
State lawmakers were also considering Tuesday another ambitious measure to fight automation discrimination when companies use AI models to screen job resumes and rental apartment applications.
veryGood! (36)
Related
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Air National Guard changes in Alaska could affect national security, civilian rescues, staffers say
- Justice Department nears settlement with Larry Nassar victims over FBI failures
- 2024 MLB MVP power rankings: Who is leading the AL, NL races 20 games into the season?
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Caitlin Clark addresses critics: 'I don't really care what other people say'
- Who is Bob Graham? Here’s what to know about the former Florida governor and senator
- Dawn Staley shares Beyoncé letter to South Carolina basketball after national championship
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Alabama lawmakers reject bill to require release of police body camera video
Ranking
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Democrats clear path to bring proposed repeal of Arizona’s near-total abortion ban to a vote
- Alabama lawmakers reject bill to require release of police body camera video
- US to pay $100 million to survivors of Nassar's abuse. FBI waited months to investigate
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- 11-year-old boy killed in ATV crash in northern Maine, wardens say
- North Carolina sees slight surplus this year, $1B more next year
- Sluggish start for spring homebuying season as home sales fall in March with mortgage rates rising
Recommendation
Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
Sydney Sweeney responds to acting criticism from film producer Carol Baum: 'That’s shameful'
Need a way to celebrate 420? Weed recommend these TV shows and movies about stoners
O.J. Simpson was chilling on the couch drinking beer, watching TV 2 weeks before he died, lawyer says
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Suspects arrested in Arkansas block party shooting that left 1 dead, 9 hurt
With 'Suffs,' Hillary Clinton brings a 'universal' story of women's rights to Broadway
Trump trial jury selection process follows a familiar pattern with an unpredictable outcome